A historical reading needs the source, territorial definition, date, and transformation description together.
Case studies, research, and engineering labs
Work whose conclusions can be traced back to data, code, and human judgement.
The catalogue includes full case studies, open research, prototypes, and engineering experiments. Each entry states its maturity, my role, and public evidence—without presenting a concept as a production system.
BY Maps / open research
Demographic change is not explained by one figure, but by connected views.
The project's original visualisation keeps observations, estimates, and conditional scenarios distinct.
Change outside major cities must be read with the series’ boundaries, definitions, and comparability in view.
Urban concentration is a research question that requires an explicit comparison of places and periods.
Scenarios are conditional models with assumptions, not a description of a future state.
3 projects
Open research
Open research · Research framing, ETL, modelling, visualisation
BY Maps
What happens to a country when its population has been concentrating around a single point for decades?
A public research material on demographic change, combining a map, research questions, and conditional scenarios. Results should be read with their source, transformation, and limitation.
What can be verified: The research site and repository lead to material and methodology; this card does not repeat figures without a versioned dataset reference.
External repository reference · This site does not claim a role or current project status
POISK-IGR
How can external material be read when repetition in secondary sources is not independent confirmation?
An external repository linked for independent inspection. This site does not make claims about its data, verification, contributors, or current status.
- entity
- claim
- source
- verification
What can be verified: An external repository and entry point are linked for inspection; its details require independent verification in that repository.
Public editorial-methodological material · This site does not claim a formal author role in the external project
BY-UA
How can public material be read so that source, claim, and editorial qualification remain distinct?
A case study of public material and editorial method. This site does not attribute a formal role in the external project to its author or state political or legal conclusions.
- question
- corpus
- citation
- conclusion
What can be verified: A public entry point is linked for independent review; URL availability does not establish authorship, role, accuracy, or current status.
4 projects
Legal AI
Research pilot · Data engineering, agent systems, reproducibility
NormaLab
How can we measure not what a legal rule says, but how it is actually applied?
A research pipeline connects a corpus of court decisions with classification, citations, counterexamples, and legal review.
- question
- corpus
- citation
- conclusion
What can be verified: The methodology, event model for interpretive activity, and verification history are public.
Architectural concept · Architecture, exchange protocol, oversight model
Legal Copilot Ukraine
What if a national Legal AI system were a network of personal workspaces rather than a single platform?
An architectural concept for exchanging verifiable work packages: sources, versions of legal rules, checks, and rejected hypotheses.
- source
- version
- check
- work package
What can be verified: A public architecture and the related open minius prototype for a personal legal workspace.
Experimental repository reference · This site does not claim a role or current project status
minius Codex Lab
How can a workspace prototype be described without presenting it as a ready-to-use tool?
An external reference to an experimental repository about a local-workspace concept. This site does not assert deployment, licensing, data handling, or current operating status.
- rules
- corpus
- skill
- test
What can be verified: The repository is linked for independent inspection; verify its contents, ownership, licence, and currency before use.
Product prototype · Workflow research, architecture, prototype
AdmissusCase
How can a human-rights lawyer regain time without handing decision-making authority to a model?
The prototype organises facts, timelines, sources, and draft materials while leaving legal assessment and responsibility with the professional.
- document
- fact
- timeline
- lawyer decision
What can be verified: The workflow, human decision points, and limitations are public; confidential case files are not disclosed.
3 projects
Agentic engineering
Open source · Workflow architecture, implementation, verification
TwinLoop
How do you stop an agent from declaring its own work complete?
Implementation and verification are separated: the specification is the contract, an independent loop looks for evidence of completion, and CI identifies the exact version that passed.
- specification
- implementation
- independent check
- CI
What can be verified: An open repository containing the workflow, tests, and verification history.
Educational prototype · Curriculum, workspace, evaluation criteria
Academic Agent Workspace
How do you teach a professional to build a working environment rather than memorise prompting techniques?
The learning environment is built around each participant's own project: its rules, corpus, repeatable skills, tests, and handover.
- rules
- corpus
- skill
- test
What can be verified: The programme structure and outcome criteria are public; participants' private materials are not published.
Research case · Research framing, evidence architecture, constraints and evaluation
An Agent Builds an Agent
How can an observed specialist workflow become an AI system allowed to act only inside a demonstrated safe boundary?
A research methodology for turning observed work into semantic contracts, tests and a bounded runtime right to act.
What can be verified: The public case states its role architecture, source context and explicit limits; it does not claim production deployment or safety certification.
3 projects
Engineering labs
Experimental repository reference · This site does not claim a role or current project status
Codex Office Playbook
How can an experimental repository about team-work rules, tasks, and checks be described?
An external reference to an experimental repository about an office workflow. This site does not assert universal organisational readiness, adoption, licensing, or current status.
- rule
- task
- pytest / ruff
- publication
What can be verified: The repository is linked for independent inspection; establish its contents, ownership, licence, and currency before use.
Independent unofficial demo · This site does not claim a role, affiliation, or current project status
OHCHR General Comments Ingest
How can an independent engineering demo about public documents be described?
An independent, unofficial reference to an engineering demonstration about ingesting public documents. It is not an OHCHR/UN material or a description of a complete corpus.
- source file
- typed schema
- manifest
- regression
What can be verified: The repository is linked for independent inspection; this site does not claim OHCHR or UN affiliation, endorsement, or current status.
Experimental workflow reference · This site does not claim a role, affiliation, or current project status
Symphony AI spec2linear
How can an experimental workflow from specification to plan and dry run be described?
An external reference to an experimental workflow repository. This site does not assert integration with, affiliation with, or approval by Linear, or a current operating status.
- spec.md
- plan
- dry run
- approval
What can be verified: The repository is linked for independent inspection; verify its contents, ownership, licence, and currency before use.
Openness has limits.
Repositories and open research can be inspected directly. Where work involves sensitive data, I publish the process, architecture, and boundaries of claims—not partner material or personal data. This limits the scope of public evidence.
Discuss a relevant project →